Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Funny How Gas Prices Stay Up Even When Oil Prices Go Down

 Ever notice how gas prices seem to hang in at elevated levels even when the price of oil goes down? The chart shows (in blue) the Spot Oil Price Per Barrel of West Texas Intermediate Oil, and (in red) the US Regular All Formulation Gas Price Per Gallon. At the yellow circles with the letters (a) through (e), notice how the price of gas lags the price of oil. At the letters f, g, and h, the gas price proportionally way overshoots the price of oil. Interestingly, at the letter i, for once, the price of gas lags the price of oil. This is most likely because at these peak levels, people started cutting back on their use of gas, due to the price, (i. e., the demand for gas saturated). In the current period, letters i and j, we are back to the normal trend, which is that gas prices are proportionally exceeding the oil price, and when oil prices go down the gas price stays up.


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

The Housing Miasma: New Record Lows in Latest Case-Shiller National Index

Below are 3 excerpts from the very prestigious, highly respected Case-Shiller Report of February 28, 2012. No one but no one dares to dispute Case-Schiller. The upshot of today's report is that US housing (like US unemployment) is recovering at the slowest rate since the Great Depression. Multiple years to go to recovery, thanks to the business bashing, energy bashing, re-distributional policies of the current administration. Celebrations re the "improving" economy, like the reports of the death of Mark Twain, and the reports of Schrodinger's cat having come back to life, are all way premature, though they may be incrementally true.

"The chart above depicts the annual returns of the U.S. National, the 10-City Composite and the 20-City Composite Home Price Indices. The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, which covers all nine U.S. census divisions, recorded a 4.0% decline in the fourth quarter of 2011 over the fourth quarter of 2010. In December, the 10- and 20-City Composites posted annual rates of decline of 3.9% and 4.0%, respectively."

"As of the fourth quarter of 2011, average home prices across the United States are back at their late 2002 levels. With this month’s report, the National Index level hit a new low, falling 3.8% over the 4th quarter and down 4.0% versus the fourth quarter of 2010."

 "As of December 2011, average home prices for these two composites (i. e., the 10-City and 20-City Composite Indices) hit new record lows. Measured from their June/July 2006 peaks through December 2011, the peak-to-current decline for both the 10-City Composite and 20-City Composite is -33.8%; the same as the national composite."



Sunday, February 26, 2012

1st Term Presidential Approval Rating: Last Year Rating Crucial For Re-Election

Note the crucial importance of the President's popularity rating during the 4th year of his first term. Both Reagan and Clinton, who won second terms, peaked up in the last year of their first term, to 55% for Clinton and 59% for Reagan. On the down side, both George Herbert Walker Bush  and Jimmy Carter drooped in their last year, down to 30% territory. Note also that even though Bust recovered popularity in the last months of his presidency, he still remained below 50% approval by election day, and went on to defeat. All this leads to the conclusion that the next 3 to 6 months will be determinative of Obama's re-election prospects. A droop in popularity between now and October will make him a 1-termer.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Long Term Unemployment Remains High While Overall Rate Drops





  
Above are thumbnails of new charts I have constructed utilizing BLS data (see source on Figure item 3 below). The charts are described as follows:
1: Chart of Long Term Unemployment (i. e., people unemployed 27 weeks or more) (in Red), as compared to overall unemployment rate (in Blue).
2. Same chart as above, with dotted lines indicating trends in both Long Term Unemployment and Overall
3. Chart showing Overall Unemployment rate since 2002 (in Blue, utilizing scale on right of chart), and 4 categories of unemployment durations:
 (a) Percent of Unemployed Long Term (>27 Weeks, in Red,    utilizing scale on left of chart),
 (b) Percent of Unemployed 15 to 26 Weeks            (in Black, utilizing scale on left of chart),
 (c) Percent of Unemployed  5 to  14 Weeks            (in Green, utilizing scale on left of chart),
 (d) Percent of Unemployed  Less Than 5 Weeks     (in Magenta, utilizing scale on left of chart).
4. Chart of the Percent Job Losses in the 12 Post World War II Recessions, where I have made 2 extrapolations of the time to recover lost jobs, optimistic extrapolation for full recovery: April of 2014, and pessimistic extrapolation for full recovery: December of 2015.

Long term unemployed (i. e., people unemployed for 27 weeks or more) now make up about 43% of all people who are unemployed. Of the remaining 57% of the unemployed, they split up equally between unemployment durations of a) less than 5 weeks, b) 5 weeks to 14 weeks, and c) 15 to 26 weeks (all data is from the Bureau of Labor Statistics BLS). So there are about twice as many  "Long Term Unemployed" as any of the other categories a) to c) above. This is highly unusual compared to the previous 11 recessions since World War II. Why?

One way to understand this is to look at the last chart in my blog www.abelesnik.blogspot.com above (entitled: "Percent Job Losses In Post WWII Recessions"). This chart says that the current economic decline (also referred to as the "Great Recssion") is expected to last about 4 times  longer than a typical recession since WWII. This results in more people remaining unemployed for longer times, and so partially can explain the doubling of the Long Term Unemployment component (compared to the other durations).

Long Term Unemployment (LTU) is a serious problem, because people's skills and capabilities become stale, out of date, and eventually uncompetitive, resulting in a vicious cycle which further reduces the LTU's chances of finding employment. Obama administration incentives to business has proved ineffectual, primarily because of their temporary nature. In stark contrast to Obama, the Reagan permanent tax cut (being permanent) succeeded in launching a decades long powerful economic resurgence and period of growth in the US.

Policy areas with the most promise to supercharge the US Economy (and thus help the LTUs) are: 1) Comprehensive Tax Reform, and 2) Energy. The presentation last week of the Fiscal 2013 budget, the killing of the Keystone pipeline, and this week's touting of Algae as the great hope for American energy production, are what is on offer from the administration. Life is easy, comedy is hard.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Unemployment & Confidence Turning Worse In An "Improving" Economy

The Dow touched 13,000 today, economic indicators are trending up, and Greek default was yet again averted,  but unemployment, underemployment, and consumer confidence is turning worse in February (back up to 9%). Check out my annotated/highlighting of Gallup plots above.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Pay No Attention to the Hole in the Ship’s Bottom: Obama’s Fiscal 2013 Budget





Introductions
Steve Jobs used to tell the story about his return to Apple in 1997. Frank Amelio, the Apple CEO at the time took Jobs aside and confided:
     “Apple is like a ship with a hole in the bottom, leaking water.”  His
        job, Amelio intoned,
is to get the ship pointed in the right direction”.
Not surprisingly, Jobs did not listen to his elder, went his own way, fixed the hole where the water was leaking in (and stopped his mind from wandering). He did other things, too, and today Apple is the number one market cap company in the world. 

Time Urgency For A Person, Company, Country
Stanching the hemorrhage is literally the sine qua non when it comes to a bleeding human being. Not necessarily so, however, for a company bleeding money, or for a great nation bleeding huge deficits.  A person can bleed to death in minutes, so immediate action is urgent. A company or nation, however, can take months or years to “fail”, where even the definition of “failure” is equivocal, so the sense of urgency is short lived, and may even be absent, like a chicken still running around, unaware momentarily that its head has been cut off.

Everyone Believes In Recovery
So is the US a headless chicken? So deep  in debt that it is doomed and it is only a matter of time? Not even Ron Paul believes that. By any measure, be it the deficit, the national debt, unemployment, or GDP, the truth is that the economy is still bad, but getting better, and doing it way too slowly. Data supporting this view is everywhere.

Increase In Spending, GDP, Debt, and Deficit (Relative to 1999)
Figure 1 shows the national debt (in blue), the annual deficit (in black), Federal spending (in red), and GDP (in green), all plotted as a percentage increases relative to 1999. The economic cataclysm known as the Great Recession is clearly evident in the precipitous increases and radical changes in slope in all the above quantities that began in 2008 (GDP excepted). The worst case increase was in annual deficit, which tripled in 2009 relative to 2008 and continues to stay at record elevated levels (about $1.5 trillion/year) projected forward to 2013. This is what continues to drive the national debt parabolically higher since 2009, to $15.5 trillion in 2011. Out of every federal dollar spent, 42 cents is borrowed and ultimately added to the national debt, and left for future generations, some yet unborn, to pay. This is illustrated in the cartoon by Michael Ramirez, shown in Figure 2.

Two Questions Re Figure 1
In contemplating Figure 1, two questions naturally arise. 1) how bad is this? The second, question,  comes back to the “Hole in the Ship’s Bottom”, namely, 2) where are all the spending dollars going and how do we stop it? 

How Speedy a Recovery?
The answer to question #1, agreed to by commentators from the political far left to the far right is the same: yes, it’s bad, but far from fatal. The chicken may be in some distress, but has not yet lost its head. Recovery is not only possible, but actually inevitable. Optimistically it will take another 1or 2 years, pessimistically it take another 3 to 4 years to recover. (See my previous Examiner article: “Are We There Yet?” - Straight Line Extrapolating the Unemployment Trend, January 26, 2012.)

Who Will Get The Economy Healthy Quicker
 The political battle this election year is not about what the eventual ultimate outcome will be. The real dogfight is about who will get us back to economic health quicker. Will it be done via Republican smaller government Ron Paul/Rick Santorum/Newt Gingrich/Mitt Romney “free market capitalism”, in 1 to 2 years? Or will we get healthy again via Obama/Pelosi Left Democrat “spread the wealth” state dominated Solyndra crony capitalistic socialism, in 3 to 4 years. This is a difference, after all, that is well worth fighting over. 

The Top 8 Federal Spending Programs as a Share of GDP
The answer to question #2 (where are all the spending dollars going?) is provided in Figure 3, which shows the Top 8 Federal spending categories as a share of GDP. The single largest category is “Safety Net and Health” (i. e., Federal Retirment & Disability, Unemployment Compensation, Welfare, SSI Disability, Child Care, Foster Care, Medicare, Medicare, Occupational Health and Safety, Research, etc.). The figure clearly identifies where the biggest hole in the ship’s bottom is, where we are spending by far the largest number of dollars, over $1.4 trillion in 2011.

Dominant Spending Share of Safety Net, Health, Medicare, & Medicaid
Note that this category jumped from about 6% - 7% of GDP (Clinton-Bush era) to 9% - 10% under Obama, which represents about a 43% increase over Bush’s last year in office. All other spending category changes pale by comparison. Social Security, defense, interest on the debt summed together barely add up to half the number of dollars expended. So fixing these smaller holes in the ship’s bottom, and ignoring the massive one, is equivalent to taking Frank Amelio’s advice. This is to play with the steering, and try to catch voters’ attention with bright shiny objects (contraception & class envy anyone?) blithely ignoring the gaping hole in the bottom of the ship of state. It’s the “What Me Worry” solution of Obama’s 2013 budget.

Where Not To Cut
As for Republican calls for killing the education department, foreign aid, the energy department, (and I forget the 4th), and even Ron Paul’s drastic reductions in defense, are seen to all miss the point. As Willie Sutton explained, he robbed banks because that’s where the money was. To cut spending, cuts have to be made where the spending is. Obama’s 2013 budget is a “What Me Worry” budget  (per Figure 4) in the sense that it doesn’t touch entitlements. 

Conclusion
The truth is that for all the so called “severe” conservative ideas we have heard about for what, 20 debates now (?), little or nothing serious has been addressed to deficit or the debt or spending cuts. So nearly a year after Paul Ryan’s budget, and over a year after Simpson-Bowles, these two plans remain the only “adult conversations” in the room. No other plans in the arena have a better chance of bringing about the rapid economic rebound we need.

Subscribers are welcome (free of charge) to my examiner.com site or if you prefer the personal touch, to my blog at abelesnik.blogspot.com.

In the immortal words of Eugene McCarthy (1968 at Chicago's Midway Airport): "All we ask for is a modicum of intelligence". If Gene were alive today (he passed in '05), he would modify one of his famous quotes as follows: "(Obama) is the kind of guy who, if you were drowning twenty feet from shore, would throw you a fifteen-foot rope.”








Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Listening Tour In LA and Milwaukee

 Listening Tour In LA and Milwaukee

Listening Tour: Today the President is on a trip to Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Los Angeles, CA. He will be attending several fund raisers and doing a lot of...ah...listening.

Obama Traffic, Street Closures in Los Angeles, Corona del Mar for February 15, 16, 2012
President Obama will be returning to Los Angeles for fundraising on Wednesday, February 15.Then he’ll go south to Orange County to attend an event in Corona del Mar on Thursday, February 16.You know what this means — many street closures and delays as the presidential motorcade goes to and fro.


Tuesday, February 14, 2012

The What Me Worry Presidency - Deficit? Debt? LOL & SW

The President's Fiscal 2013 Budget and broken promise on the deficit...
February 23, 2009: “today I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office.”
February 14, 2012: "a lot of us didn't understand how bad it was going to get."

Steve Jobs on Obama, February 10, 2010...
"The president is very smart, but he kept explaining to us reasons why things can't get done. It infuriates me."

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Increase In Spending, GDP, National Debt, and Deficit, Since 1999

Increase In Spending, GDP, National Debt, and Deficit, Since 1999
Tomorrow the 2012 Federal Budget is revealed. To help forecast what this will mean for the economy and the stock market, take a peek at the Figure above. The US National Debt (in blue) shows what is called "hockey stick" behavior, i. e., a sharp change in slope upward, which occurrs at the start of 2009 and continues at an accelerated rate or slope, as compared to calmer period 1999-2008.

The GDP, on the other hand, starting in 2009, pretty much runs into a brick wall, leveling off and nearly ceasing its previous steady upward climb from 1999. Most important however is the behavior of the Deficit (black line) which shows "hockey stick" on steroid behavior between 2008 and 2009, rising almost vertically.

The deficit jumped from averages of about $300-$400 billion 1999-2008, to current levels of $1300-$1500 billion, nearly tripling in value from 2008 to 2009. This is what drives the blue curve (National Debt) through the roof. The word is that the new budget tomorrow projects a 2012 deficit of $1.5 trillion, matching the highest levels since the Great Recession. Follow me on abelesnik.blogspot.com for discussion, economic predictions, and more charts and graphs on the economy, plus some Shakespeare quotes.

Top 10 Spending Pgms As % of All Spending, Since 1999

The President's budget for 2012 was released this morning, so it is appropriate to review where all that money is being spent. The top 10 budget items are shown in my below blog, as a percentage of total spending, for the years 1999-2011. This is also available to be viewed as a percentage of GDP, if you look on my blog, abelesnik.blogspot.com. (You can follow me on the  blog by going there and clicking on the "Follow" and or" Subscribe"  box).

Some things are worth noting about the way government spends, since there are some surprises there, and often the conventional understanding may differ from the actual facts, as follows:

1. Social Security (since 1999) has actually been decreasing as a percentage of all spending! However, as a percentage of GDP, Social Security has been flat through 2008, and then jumped up significantly in the last 3 years. Probably a lot of baby boomers retiring in the face of the bad economy. But it safely can be said that growth in Social Security, while it is about 20% of the spending (like Defense) is  NOT the big budget problem.

2. Interest on the debt, as a percentage of spending and also GDP, has FALLEN to halfl of the percentages in 1999. In real dollars, the interest on the debt has stayed at about $200 billion per year (5% of all spending).  We have to thank Ben Bernanke for low interest rates for this. This is a dangerous item, because when the economy recovers in about 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 years from now, interest rates will go back up, and then interest payments on the debt will double or triple or more. But again, interest on the debt is far from dangerous levels, and  not a big budget problem.

More to come.

Top 10 US Spending Pgms As % of GDP, Since 1999


Saturday, February 11, 2012

State By State Trends In Unemployment: 3 Years At A Glance

State By State Trends In Unemployment: 3 Years At A Glance

The above chart updates a previous chart by adding BLS data from December of 2011. This allows observation of a possible trend in unemployment on a state by state basis, from the peak of the Great Recession, to January 2011, to December of 2011. During this period the national unemployed rate decreased from a peak of 10.1% in October of 2009 to the current January 2012 value of 8.3%.

North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska continue to lead the nation with the lowest unemployment rate, about 4%, having also improved slightly over the course of 3 years since 2009. Michigan shows the greatest improvement, going from about 14% to about 7% in 3 years. Idaho, Illinois, Washington DC, Missouri, and Montana show signs of  retrograde progress, showing somewhat worse unemployment in December of 2011 than in January of 2011.
Unemployment data seems to be based on the number of new applications for unemployment insurance, and not on the total number of people unemployed and either looking for work, or not looking for work. There doesn't seem to be any accurate data around for how many people are actually unemployed. So any presentation of this lack of data seems useless.

One Look Tells All: Unemployment State By State


One Look Says All: Unemployment State By State

The nearly universal buzz one hears these days is that both  the economy and the most important human number – unemployment - have been getting better. Have they really? Examine the record, using the below Wall Street Journal URL as a source:


Extracts from the above link are displayed in the below plot, showing 1) (red line) the highest unemployment, by state, in the last 2 years (Jan ’09 to Jan ’11), and 2) (blue line) the current unemployment as of Jan ’11. Table of data also provided below.

What can we learn from this plot? Well, it turns out that fully ten states have less than 0.1% improvement over their worst case in the last 2 years. Moreover, four states actually are in worse shape in Jan ’11 than their worst case in the 2 years prior. Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Texas, Utah, West Virginia. That’s 20% of the states!. From an eyeball perspective, an improvement would look like a blue line consistently inside the red line. This is not what is seen. Hence the title: The “Improved” Unemployment Picture Is Unsupported By The Data

The National Bureau of Economic Research determined that the recession that began in December 2007 ended in June 2009. It is oft repeated (and true) that if one were to derive the unemployment figures the same as during the Great Depression, then the true rate would actually also be at Great Depression levels, i. e., 17% - 25%. But the Bernanke-Obama-Geithner nobless oblige bureaucratic intelligentsia cannot and will not acknowledge this. Because that would only hasten their own entry in the unemployment rolls.

The past election spoke in very loud volumes, but apparently loud enough neither for John Boehner, nor Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who are so frightened of the political consequences of a government shutdown that their ears no longer work. And Obama, who has bigger ears than any former president, is stone cold deaf on this. A tsunami of noise is coming in November 2012. The whistle on the Tea Party Express is the warning.

Are the States Doing Better Lately On 
Unemployment? 
     
Comparison (By State) of Highest  Unemployment In 2 yrs With Current (Jan '11) 

 
 






Table: Highest Unemployment Rate (%) From January 2009 To January 2011, By State

Highest
1-09 to 1-11

Jan '11


Highest
1-09 to 1-11

Jan '11


Highest
1-09 to 1-11

Jan '11
Alabama
11
9.2

Kentucky
10.9
10.4

NDakota
4.4
3.8
Alaska
8.5
7.5

Lousiana
8.2
7.9

Ohio
11
9.4
Arizona
9.7
9.6

Maine
8.3
7.5

Oklahoma
7
6.6
Arkansas
7.8
7.8

Maryland
7.9
7.2

Oregon
11.6
10.4
California
12.6
12.4

Massachusetts
9.5
8.3

Pennsylvania
9.3
8.2
Colorado
9.1
9.1

Michigan
14.5
10.7

Rhode Island
12.7
11.3
Connecticut
9.2
9

Minnesota
8.4
6.7

SCarolina
12.5
10.5
Delaware
9.2
8.5

Mississippi
11.6
10.1

SDakota
4.9
4.7
WashDC
12
9.6

Missouri
9.8
9.6

Tennessee
10.9
9.5
Florida
12.3
11.9

Montana
6.2
7.5

Texas
7.8
8.3
Georgia
10.5
10.4

Nebraska
5
4.2

Utah
6.6
7.6
Hawaii
7
6.3

Nevada
14.5
14.2

Vermont
7.2
5.7
Idaho
7.9
9.7

NewHampsh
7.1
5.6

Virginia
7.3
6.5
Illinois
11.5
9

NewJersey
10
9.1

Washington
9.5
9.1
Indiana
10.6
9

NewMexico
8.8
8.7

W Virginia
9.5
9.5
Iowa
6.9
6.1

NewYork
8.9
8.3

Wisconsin
8.9
7.4
Kansas
7.2
6.8

NCarolina
11.2
9.9

Wyoming
7.6
6.3