The
nearly universal buzz one hears these days is that both the economy and the most important human number
– unemployment - have been getting better. Have they really? Examine the
record, using the below Wall Street Journal URL as a source:
Extracts
from the above link are displayed in the below plot, showing 1) (red line) the
highest unemployment, by state, in the last 2 years (Jan ’09 to Jan ’11), and
2) (blue line) the current unemployment as of Jan ’11. Table of data also provided
below.
What
can we learn from this plot? Well, it turns out that fully ten states have less
than 0.1% improvement over their worst case in the last 2 years. Moreover, four
states actually are in worse shape in
Jan ’11 than their worst case in the 2 years prior. Arizona, Arkansas,
Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Texas, Utah, West Virginia.
That’s 20% of the states!. From an eyeball perspective, an improvement would
look like a blue line consistently inside the red line. This is not what is
seen. Hence the title: The “Improved” Unemployment Picture Is Unsupported By The Data
The National Bureau of Economic Research determined that the recession that began in December 2007 ended in
June 2009. It is oft repeated (and true) that if one were to derive the unemployment figures
the same as during the Great Depression, then the true rate would actually also
be at Great Depression levels, i. e., 17% - 25%. But the Bernanke-Obama-Geithner
nobless oblige bureaucratic intelligentsia cannot and will not acknowledge this.
Because that would only hasten their own entry in the unemployment rolls.
The
past election spoke in very loud volumes, but apparently loud enough neither
for John Boehner, nor Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who are so frightened of the
political consequences of a government shutdown that their ears no longer work.
And Obama, who has bigger ears than any former president, is stone cold deaf on
this. A tsunami of noise is coming in November 2012. The whistle on the Tea
Party Express is the warning.
|
Table:
Highest Unemployment Rate (%) From January 2009 To January 2011, By State
|
Highest
1-09 to 1-11 |
Jan '11 |
|
|
Highest
1-09 to 1-11 |
Jan '11 |
|
|
Highest
1-09 to 1-11 |
Jan '11 |
Alabama
|
11
|
9.2
|
|
Kentucky
|
10.9
|
10.4
|
|
NDakota
|
4.4
|
3.8
|
Alaska
|
8.5
|
7.5
|
|
Lousiana
|
8.2
|
7.9
|
|
Ohio
|
11
|
9.4
|
Arizona
|
9.7
|
9.6
|
|
Maine
|
8.3
|
7.5
|
|
Oklahoma
|
7
|
6.6
|
Arkansas
|
7.8
|
7.8
|
|
Maryland
|
7.9
|
7.2
|
|
Oregon
|
11.6
|
10.4
|
California
|
12.6
|
12.4
|
|
Massachusetts
|
9.5
|
8.3
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
9.3
|
8.2
|
Colorado
|
9.1
|
9.1
|
|
Michigan
|
14.5
|
10.7
|
|
Rhode Island
|
12.7
|
11.3
|
Connecticut
|
9.2
|
9
|
|
Minnesota
|
8.4
|
6.7
|
|
SCarolina
|
12.5
|
10.5
|
Delaware
|
9.2
|
8.5
|
|
Mississippi
|
11.6
|
10.1
|
|
SDakota
|
4.9
|
4.7
|
WashDC
|
12
|
9.6
|
|
Missouri
|
9.8
|
9.6
|
|
Tennessee
|
10.9
|
9.5
|
Florida
|
12.3
|
11.9
|
|
Montana
|
6.2
|
7.5
|
|
Texas
|
7.8
|
8.3
|
Georgia
|
10.5
|
10.4
|
|
Nebraska
|
5
|
4.2
|
|
Utah
|
6.6
|
7.6
|
Hawaii
|
7
|
6.3
|
|
Nevada
|
14.5
|
14.2
|
|
Vermont
|
7.2
|
5.7
|
Idaho
|
7.9
|
9.7
|
|
NewHampsh
|
7.1
|
5.6
|
|
Virginia
|
7.3
|
6.5
|
Illinois
|
11.5
|
9
|
|
NewJersey
|
10
|
9.1
|
|
Washington
|
9.5
|
9.1
|
Indiana
|
10.6
|
9
|
|
NewMexico
|
8.8
|
8.7
|
|
W Virginia
|
9.5
|
9.5
|
Iowa
|
6.9
|
6.1
|
|
NewYork
|
8.9
|
8.3
|
|
Wisconsin
|
8.9
|
7.4
|
Kansas
|
7.2
|
6.8
|
|
NCarolina
|
11.2
|
9.9
|
|
Wyoming
|
7.6
|
6.3
|
No comments:
Post a Comment